<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conficker shows us the future &#8211; and it sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnorth.net/2009/03/27/conficker-and-the-future-of-home-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnorth.net/2009/03/27/conficker-and-the-future-of-home-computing/</link>
	<description>The scribblings of an Oxford-based geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:31:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: akenyon</title>
		<link>http://www.dnorth.net/2009/03/27/conficker-and-the-future-of-home-computing/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>akenyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnorth.net/?p=110#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Here is an exciting article about Conficker which i read coincidentally about a minute before i came here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7973131.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an exciting article about Conficker which i read coincidentally about a minute before i came here:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7973131.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7973131.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dnorth.net/2009/03/27/conficker-and-the-future-of-home-computing/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnorth.net/?p=110#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&gt;The question has to be asked, though - why the hell is it possible for code running 
&gt; as a limited user - or, come to that, any user - to intercept API calls like this?

Erm, I think you&#039;ll find that the user hasn&#039;t run Windows Update very recently (were they still on SP2?), and so they&#039;ve been hit by an exploit that uses a known and patched vulnerability that allows privilege escalation.  And once you&#039;re an admin, well, you&#039;ve generally got the right to modify memory.

FWIW, in recent cases I&#039;ve had to deal with like this, my professional advice has been &quot;pull your data off, let me scan it for nasties (mmm, autoruns), and re-install Windows.  And then maybe we&#039;ll let you back on the network&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;The question has to be asked, though &#8211; why the hell is it possible for code running<br />
&gt; as a limited user &#8211; or, come to that, any user &#8211; to intercept API calls like this?</p>
<p>Erm, I think you&#8217;ll find that the user hasn&#8217;t run Windows Update very recently (were they still on SP2?), and so they&#8217;ve been hit by an exploit that uses a known and patched vulnerability that allows privilege escalation.  And once you&#8217;re an admin, well, you&#8217;ve generally got the right to modify memory.</p>
<p>FWIW, in recent cases I&#8217;ve had to deal with like this, my professional advice has been &#8220;pull your data off, let me scan it for nasties (mmm, autoruns), and re-install Windows.  And then maybe we&#8217;ll let you back on the network&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

